Models & sync
Structured representations of layout and logic, plus update pipelines when engineering sources move.
Industrial Automation · also in Software & Connected
Build plant-floor digital twins from CAD layouts and PLC programs — so you can simulate, validate, train, commission, and troubleshoot without putting the live line at risk.
Why we do this
Live lines are expensive places to discover that a divert path is wrong, a sequence deadlocks under load, or a layout change no longer matches the controls. A digital twin lets teams exercise the spatial layout and the behavioral logic together — before, during, and after commissioning.
We treat twins as practical engineering tools: grounded in your CAD and PLC sources, updated when those sources change, and useful for simulation, validation, training, and troubleshooting. Soft claims only — exact depth and tooling are defined with you for each engagement.
How we do this
CAD becomes the spatial model; PLC logic becomes the behavioral model; sensors, I/O, and HMI context connect them where it helps.
Use plant or cell CAD as the spatial backbone — conveyors, equipment footprints, clearances, and routing geometry — so the twin reflects how the floor is actually arranged.
Map modes, sequences, interlocks, and fault paths from PLC logic into a behavioral model the twin can run — not a disconnected animation.
Where relevant, wire photoeyes, scanners, drives, and operator screens into the twin so decisions and status look like they do on the floor.
Plan for updates when CAD or PLC programs change, so the twin stays a trustworthy rehearsal space instead of a one-time demo.
Simulate scenarios, validate logic, train operators, support commissioning, and troubleshoot offline — then take only proven changes to the live line.
What we do
Representative ways we can help. Exact scope is defined with you for each engagement.
Spatial digital twins built from plant, line, or cell CAD — useful for layout review, clearance checks, and visualizing material flow before steel and cable are committed.
Behavioral models driven by PLC sequences, modes, and faults so the twin behaves like the controls — not only like a 3D picture.
Bring spatial and behavioral layers together so layout and logic can be exercised as one system for simulation and validation.
Practical update paths when CAD revisions or PLC program changes land — so the twin stays aligned with engineering reality.
Use the twin to rehearse sequences, train operators and maintainers, and reduce surprises during bring-up — without interrupting production.
Where natural, use twins as safe sandboxes for conveyor routing/sorting scenarios and for light industrial-AI or vision logic checks before live trials — see also Conveyor & PLC and Industrial AI.
Also in Software & Connected
Digital twins sit on the plant floor and in software. The same specialty spans both streams.
Beyond the industrial control stack, twins often need application layers: data models, visualization clients, sync jobs when CAD or PLC exports change, and interfaces operators or engineers use to run scenarios. That work fits naturally alongside our Software & Connected stream — device-facing apps, clear UX, and maintainable integration code.
Structured representations of layout and logic, plus update pipelines when engineering sources move.
Interfaces to start sims, inject faults, review outcomes, and hand findings back to controls or layout teams.
Where helpful, tie twins to sensors, HMIs, or inventory/ID flows so software and floor stay in the same conversation.
Listed under both Industrial Automation and Software & Connected — one page, dual placement.
Standards
A digital twin is only as trustworthy as its data and connections. We build twins with manufacturing twin-framework concepts, versioned assets, open industrial protocols, and cybersecurity hygiene so simulation stays aligned with the real line.
A digital twin framework for manufacturing — reference architecture for how observable manufacturing elements connect to digital representations.
How we follow it: We keep twin scope explicit (which assets, which signals, which fidelity) so the twin matches a defined manufacturing use case — simulate, train, or commission — not an unbounded mirror.
CAD, PLC programs, and twin parameters drift unless revisions are controlled like any other engineering artifact.
How we follow it: We version twin models against known PLC/CAD baselines and document what changed between simulation runs.
Open protocols that let twins and live equipment exchange structured data without one-off proprietary lock-in.
How we follow it: Where live or near-live sync is needed, we prefer documented OPC UA or MQTT contracts with clear namespaces and update rates.
A twin that reaches into OT can become an attack path if connectivity is casual.
How we follow it: We limit twin network exposure, use authenticated channels, and keep read/write privileges appropriate to the twin’s purpose.
Share CAD layout context, PLC program notes, and what you want to simulate or validate — we can outline a practical twin approach.
Get a quote